Master of the universe

SASS vs LESS vs Stylus - CSS Preprocessor Comparison


CSS preprocessors have become an integral part of the web development landscape, allowing developers to write maintainable and scalable stylesheets for modern projects. By extending the capabilities of CSS, preprocessors deliver various benefits, such as the creation of reusable variables, mixins, functions, and more. This considerably improves code maintainability and collaboration among developers on a project. In this article, we will compare three popular CSS preprocessors: Sass, Less, and Stylus, to help you choose the right one for your project.


Overview and Features

Sass (Syntactically Awesome StyleSheets) has garnered a significant following since its introduction in 2006. Created by Hampton Catlin, with major contributions from Natalie Weizenbaum, and Chris Eppstein, Sass has become a staple for many web developers.

One of the reasons for its popularity is its versatility. Sass has two syntaxes: SCSS (Sassy CSS) and the indented Sass syntax. SCSS is a superset of CSS, meaning that any valid CSS code can be written directly in SCSS files, making the transition fairly smooth for newcomers. On the other hand, the indented Sass syntax is whitespace-sensitive and omits curly braces and semicolons, which might be preferable for developers with a preference for Ruby or Python-like syntax.

Sass comes loaded with several powerful features, including:

  1. Variables: Store values that can be reused throughout your stylesheet.
  2. Nesting: Nest selectors within other selectors, writing cleaner and more organized code.
  3. Mixins: Write reusable chunks of CSS code and include them in different parts of your stylesheet.
  4. Functions: Perform calculations or manipulate values using prebuilt and custom functions.
  5. Conditionals: Use if, else, and other conditional statements for greater control over your styles.
  6. Loops: Iterate over lists and maps using @each, @for, and @while loop directives.
  7. Imports: Import other Sass files seamlessly, allowing modular and organized stylesheets.


Overview and Features

Less (Leaner Style Sheets) is another widely-used CSS preprocessor created by Alexis Sellier in 2009. It gained popularity as a more declarative and clearer alternative to Sass at the time, bearing similarities to standard CSS syntax. However, it offers only one syntax option, as opposed to both SCSS and indented syntax in Sass.

Less provides a comprehensive set of features to help streamline your CSS development process. Some of its key features include:

  1. Variables: Define and reuse values throughout your stylesheets to maintain consistency and reduce redundancy.
  2. Nesting: Organize your code more efficiently by nesting selectors according to their hierarchy in the HTML structure.
  3. Mixins: Create reusable CSS snippets that can be easily inserted into other parts of your stylesheet.
  4. Functions: Use built-in functions to perform calculations, adjust colors, and more, providing greater control over your styles.
  5. Conditionals: Implement logic using if, else, and other conditional statements for more dynamic styling.
  6. Loops: Utilize the each and for loop directives to iterate over lists or maps, streamlining repetitive tasks.
  7. Imports: Seamlessly import and combine Less files to create modular and maintainable stylesheets.

Community and Ecosystem

Less enjoys a sizable community of developers and maintains a strong presence in the web development ecosystem. As a result, there are numerous resources, libraries, and tools available to make working with Less more efficient.

Some popular CSS frameworks, such as Bootstrap (version 3), Semantic UI, and UIKit, have adopted Less as their preferred preprocessor, making it a reliable choice for various projects.

Notable libraries and resources for Less include:

  1. Less Elements: A set of useful mixins to simplify working with CSS properties.
  2. Preboot.less: A comprehensive collection of mixins and variables for building responsive websites.

The significant community backing and available resources make Less a convenient and practical solution for many web development projects.


Overview and Features

Stylus is the youngest among the trio, created by TJ Holowaychuk in 2010. Although it has a smaller community compared to Sass and Less, Stylus has gained a niche following due to its unique and highly flexible syntax. Stylus allows both indented and standard CSS-like syntax, enabling developers to tailor their stylesheets according to their preferences.

Stylus comes with a versatile set of features to provide a robust and customizable development experience, including:

  1. Variables: Store and reuse values across your stylesheets to maintain a consistent design system.
  2. Nesting: Arrange your code in a clear and meaningful structure by nesting selectors based on their HTML hierarchy.
  3. Mixins: Define reusable portions of CSS code and insert them in different parts of your stylesheets as needed.
  4. Functions: Make use of built-in and custom functions to manipulate values and perform calculations.
  5. Conditionals: Implement if, else, and other conditional statements for more granular control over your styles.
  6. Loops: Take advantage of each, for, and while loop directives to iterate over lists and maps, automating repetitive tasks.
  7. Imports: Import other Stylus files to create modular and organized stylesheets with ease.

Community and Ecosystem

Stylus may not have the largest community compared to Sass and Less, but the support it does have is quite dedicated. Consequently, there is a range of resources, tools, and libraries available for developers working with Stylus.

While no major CSS framework has officially adopted Stylus as the primary preprocessor, various community-driven ports for popular frameworks, such as Bootstrap-stylus, can be found.

Here are some notable libraries that can make working with Stylus more efficient:

  1. Nib: A collection of Stylus mixins and utilities designed to enhance your workflow.
  2. Jeet: A powerful grid framework for Stylus that makes creating responsive layouts a breeze.
  3. Rupture: A collection of utilities for implementing responsive typography within Stylus.

Although Stylus might not have the largest ecosystem, its flexibility and unique feature set make it a viable choice for specific projects or developers who appreciate its syntax and capabilities.


Syntax and Flexibility

When comparing Sass, Less, and Stylus, it's important to understand how their syntax and flexibility might impact your workflow and overall development experience. Each preprocessor has its unique characteristics, and your preferred syntax plays a critical role in your choice.

Sass offers two syntax options: SCSS and indented Sass. SCSS closely resembles standard CSS, making it approachable for developers who are just starting with preprocessors or who want to maintain the familiarity of CSS. On the other hand, the indented Sass syntax caters to developers who prefer a more concise and whitespace-sensitive style, similar to languages like Ruby or Python.

Less is known for its natural and clear syntax, which closely mirrors CSS. As a declarative language, Less code is easy to understand and write for developers already acquainted with CSS. However, it lacks the ability to switch between CSS-like and indented syntax, unlike Sass and Stylus.

Stylus shines in terms of flexibility and adaptability, as it provides both indented and standard CSS-like syntax options. This flexibility allows developers to write code that aligns with their aesthetic preferences and can seamlessly adapt to different coding styles within a team.

Ultimately, the right syntax is a matter of personal choice and team consensus. Some developers may prefer the readability and familiarity of SCSS or Less, while others might opt for a more minimalistic approach with indented syntax in Sass or Stylus.

Feature Set and Capabilities

Each CSS preprocessor comes with a comprehensive set of features that enables developers to write efficient and maintainable stylesheets. While Sass, Less, and Stylus share many similarities in terms of features, there might be some unique or exclusive aspects to consider.

Sass boasts a robust feature set that includes variables, nesting, mixins, functions, conditionals, loops, and imports. With both SCSS and indented syntax options, Sass provides a complete package for developers who require versatility and a full-range of features.

Less offers comparable features to Sass, including variables, nesting, mixins, functions, conditionals, loops, and imports. However, Less might lag in terms of certain advanced capabilities, such as custom functions and control directives that Sass supports. Despite this, Less is undoubtedly sufficient for most web development projects.

Stylus differentiates itself through its intuitive syntax, interchangeable indented and CSS-like syntax, and the ability to omit braces, colons, and semicolons. While Stylus encompasses all the essential features present in Sass and Less, it also offers some exclusive features, such as transparent mixins, more advanced interpolation, and the ability to create custom property names.

When comparing the features and capabilities of these preprocessors, Sass and Stylus come out as the frontrunners, with Less being a close competitor. The final decision depends on the specific requirements of your project and how comfortable you are with each preprocessor's unique offerings.

Performance and Compilation

Performance and compilation times play a significant role when comparing CSS preprocessors, as they have the potential to impact your workflow and larger projects. Let's take a look at the performance of Sass, Less, and Stylus in terms of compilation speed.

Sass has three compiler options: Ruby Sass (deprecated), Dart Sass, and LibSass. While Ruby Sass was known for being slow and has been deprecated in favor of the newer Dart Sass, LibSass is a C/C++ port of Sass that boasts a faster compilation time. However, Dart Sass has emerged as the primary implementation since it is continually maintained and benchmarked, even though LibSass might be faster in certain scenarios. The compilation speed of Sass compilers may vary depending on the project size and complexity, but it's generally considered efficient for most use cases.

Less utilizes the Less.js compiler by default, which is relatively fast and suitable for most web development projects. Additionally, there are other third-party compilers available, such as LESS-PHP, which might be faster in some cases. Less's compilation time is acceptable for the majority of projects and usually shouldn't hinder productivity.

Stylus has its own compiler, which is relatively fast, especially in watch mode. As your project scales, you might experience slightly slower compilation times. Nevertheless, Stylus's compiler performance is efficient and sufficient for most web development projects.

Comparing the performance and compilation speed of these preprocessors, they each perform relatively well for most projects. However, larger projects might need to pay closer attention to performance differences when working with specific compilers or build tools. It's recommended to test each preprocessor with your specific project requirements to find the best fit in terms of performance.

Community Support and Ecosystem

When selecting a CSS preprocessor, community support and the ecosystem are factors that contribute to long-term success and sustainability. Strong community backing contributes to regular updates, ongoing development, and the availability of valuable resources, libraries, and frameworks.

Sass enjoys a large and active community that provides various resources and tools to enrich your experience. Its adoption by major frameworks, such as Bootstrap, also speaks to its popularity and trustworthiness.

Less has a considerable community presence but may not be as extensive as Sass's. Despite this, Less is still a reliable choice, as it has been adopted by several CSS frameworks (such as Bootstrap 3 and Semantic UI) and comes with a range of resources and libraries to support your workflow.

Stylus has a smaller but dedicated community, with a more niche following compared to Sass and Less. Although there is no major CSS framework that officially adopts Stylus as the primary preprocessor, the dedicated community has created ports and alternatives to integrate Stylus into your workflow.

All three preprocessors have a place in the web development ecosystem, but the size and activity of the community surrounding Sass and Less make them more prominent choices. When evaluating community support and ecosystem, Sass is the frontrunner, followed by Less and Stylus. However, choosing a preprocessor should ultimately depend on your project's specific needs, preferences, and the available resources that align with your goals.


Sass, Less, and Stylus each have their unique strengths and weaknesses when it comes to syntax, features, performance, and community support. We've compared these CSS preprocessors based on various factors to help you make an informed decision for your projects.

Sass stands out as the most versatile option, offering a robust feature set, flexibility with SCSS and indented syntax, abundant community support, and an extensive ecosystem. On the other hand, Less provides a familiar and clear CSS-like syntax in combination with a comprehensive feature set, making it suitable for those with a CSS-centric approach. Lastly, Stylus offers the most flexible syntax, interchangeability between indented and CSS-like styles, and unique features that cater to developers who appreciate a more minimalistic syntax or require its exclusive capabilities.

Ultimately, the choice between Sass, Less, and Stylus should be based on your team's preferences, your project's requirements, and how well the preprocessor aligns with your workflow and long-term goals.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a CSS preprocessor, and why should I use one?

A CSS preprocessor is a scripting language that extends the capabilities of CSS by allowing developers to write reusable code, perform calculations, and create complex logic using variables, functions, mixins, and more. Using a CSS preprocessor can save time, improve code organization and maintainability, and aid collaboration within a team.

Can I use multiple preprocessors in a single project?

Although it's possible to use multiple CSS preprocessors within the same project, it may lead to confusion, increased complexity, and inconsistency in your stylesheets. It's highly recommended to choose one preprocessor that best suits your project requirements and preferences.

Which is the easiest CSS preprocessor to learn?

Each preprocessor has its learning curve, and the ease of learning depends on personal preferences and familiarity with CSS. That being said, the SCSS syntax of Sass and Less are considered more approachable for beginners, as they resemble standard CSS.

How do I convert my existing CSS codebase to use a preprocessor?

When transitioning from a CSS codebase to a preprocessor, consider the following steps:

  1. Choose the preprocessor that best fits your project's needs.
  2. Configure your build system to compile the preprocessor code to CSS (using tools like Gulp, Webpack, or Grunt).
  3. Break down your existing CSS into smaller, logical segments, and begin to implement the features of your chosen preprocessor, such as variables, mixins, and nesting.

Do I need any special tools or software to use a CSS preprocessor?

Most CSS preprocessors require a compiler to convert their code into standard CSS. Depending on your chosen preprocessor, you may also need to integrate other tools (like Gulp, Webpack, or Grunt) to manage the compilation process and automate any additional development tasks. Additionally, some preprocessors offer online editors or plugins for code editors to make the development process more seamless.

Sign up for the Artisan Beta

Help us reimagine WordPress.

Whether you’re a smaller site seeking to optimize performance, or mid-market/enterprise buildinging out a secure WordPress architecture – we’ve got you covered. 

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.